- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A reflection on research ethics and citizen science
Research Ethics 15 (3-4):1-10 (2019)
Abstract
Ethics review of research involving humans has become something of an institution in recent years. It is intended to protect participants from harm and, to that end, follows rigorous standards. Giv...Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Equality and Equity in Compensating Patient Engagement in Research: A Plea for Exceptionalism.Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon, Vincent Couture & Marie-Christine Roy - 2021 - Sage Publications Ltd: Research Ethics 18 (2):126-131.
Informational risk, institutional review, and autonomy in the proposed changes to the common rule.M. Allyse, K. Karkazis, S. S. Lee, S. L. Tobin, H. T. Greely, M. K. Cho & D. Magnus - 2012 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (3):17-19.
Ethics of research involving humans: Uniform processes for disparate categories?Malcolm Parker, Jim Holt, Graeme Turner & Jack Broerse - 2003 - Monash Bioethics Review 22 (3):S50-S65.
Evaluating the science and ethics of research on humans: a guide for IRB members.Dennis John Mazur - 2007 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Development of a Research Integrity and Ethics Framework in a Higher Education Institution: Five Years On.Birgit Whitman & Gillian Tallents - 2010 - Research Ethics 6 (3):81-85.
Persons and Groups: Protection of Research Participants with Vulnerabilities as a Process.Paweł Łuków - 2022 - In Tomas Zima & David N. Weisstub (eds.), Medical Research Ethics: Challenges in the 21st Century. Springer Verlag. pp. 49-63.
Rethinking research ethics committees in low- and medium-income countries.Luchuo Engelbert Bain, Ikenna Desmond Ebuenyi, Nkoke Clovis Ekukwe & Paschal Kum Awah - 2017 - Research Ethics 14 (1):1-7.
What Can We Learn From the Discussion on Anglophone Ethics Committees? An Analysis of Selected (Contested) Issues.Adrianna Surmiak - 2023 - Diametros 19 (76):15-29.
Oversight of research involving the dead.Mark R. Wicclair & Michael A. DeVita - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (2):143-164.
Analytics
Added to PP
2019-08-24
Downloads
18 (#1,103,019)
6 months
6 (#835,286)
2019-08-24
Downloads
18 (#1,103,019)
6 months
6 (#835,286)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn.: Beauchamp T L, Childress J F. Oxford University Press, 2001, pound19.95, pp 454. ISBN 0-19-514332-. [REVIEW]S. Holm - 2002 - Journal of Medical Ethics 28 (5):332-a-332.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-xdmqb uwo