Opinion on the Legal Framework Concerning Interventions in Human Germline Genes in Belgium

In Jochen Taupitz & Silvia Deuring (eds.), Rechtliche Aspekte der Genom-Editierung an der Menschlichen Keimbahn : A Comparative Legal Study. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 39-61 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Opinion deals with the legal framework concerning interventions in human germline genes in Belgium. Gene modification methods are not new and have been used for several decades playing an essential role in biomedical research. The development of new genome editing technologies, such as CRISPR-Cas9 have made possible simple and precise modifications. What makes CRISPR-Cas9 different from earlier known techniques for genetic modification is that it is cheap, easy and quick to work with, which has made it easily accessible. The 40 years old global consensus on prohibiting human germline gene modification has come under significant pressure in 2015. The announcement in April 2015 of genome editing of non-viable human embryos using CRISPR-Cas9 demonstrated that human germline modification has moved out of the realm of the theoretical.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,607

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Human germline editing: a historical perspective.Michel Morange - 2017 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39 (4):34.
La técnica CRISPR-Cas9 unos años después.Gilberto A. Gamboa-Bernal - 2022 - Persona y Bioética 25 (2):2521-2521.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
5 (#1,744,915)

6 months
2 (#1,683,984)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references