Why is integration so difficult? Shifting roles of ethics and three idioms for thinking about science, technology and society

Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):21-36 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary science and technology research are now expected to become more responsible through collaboration with social scientists and scholars from the humanities. This paper suggests a frame explaining why such current calls for ‘integration’ are seen as appropriate across sectors even though there are no shared understanding of how proper integration is to take place. The call for integration is understood as a response to shifting roles of ethics within research structures following shifts in modes of knowledge production. Integration is difficult, this paper suggests, because it challenges the modern normative division of labor affecting professional identities across sectors. Working out modes of integration is one important venue for working out alternative professional identities on the one hand and viable alternative understandings of research on the other hand. This paper discusses the matter with reference to three successive idioms for thinking about science, technology and society discussed in the literature; the representational, performative and co-production idiom.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Integrating data to acquire new knowledge: Three modes of integration in plant science.Sabina Leonelli - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):503-514.
Top Management Team Behavioral Integration.Andrea K. Young - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:314-325.
Practical Integration: the Art of Balancing Values, Institutions and Knowledge. Lessons from the History of British Public Health and Town Planning.Giovanni De Grandis - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 56:92-105.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-12

Downloads
32 (#714,285)

6 months
14 (#240,419)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Pandora’s hope.Bruno Latour - 1999 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Representing and Intervening.Ian Hacking - 1983 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (4):381-390.

View all 18 references / Add more references