Erratum to: Demonstratives without rigidity or ambiguity

Linguistics and Philosophy 37 (5):437-437 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Demonstratives without rigidity or ambiguity.Ethan Nowak - 2014 - Linguistics and Philosophy 37 (5):409-436.
Erratum: Rigidity, Force and Physical Geometry.[author unknown] - 1942 - Philosophy of Science 9 (1):121-121.
Reference and Ambiguity in Complex Demonstratives.Geoff Georgi - 2012 - In Bill Kabasenche, Michael O'Rourke & Matthew Slater (eds.), Reference and Referring: Topics in Contemporary Philosophy, Volume 10. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 357-384.
Complex demonstratives.Josh Dever - 2001 - Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (3):271-330.
Demonstratives in philosophy and linguistics.Lynsey Wolter - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):451-468.
Demonstratives as individual concepts.Paul Elbourne - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (4):409-466.
Erratum.Joyce Friedman & David S. Warren - 1979 - Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1):139 -.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-10-28

Downloads
34 (#682,784)

6 months
3 (#1,391,129)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ethan Nowak
Stanford University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references