Can the Interdisciplinarity of Cognitive Science Be Saved Through Deconstruction?

Studia Philosophiae Christianae 58 (2):137-144 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses the resources for deconstruction offered by cognitive science, drawing inspiration from David Gunkel’s work on the topic (Deconstruction, MIT Press 2021). The gesture of deconstruction is seen as having a positive impact on the development of this interdisciplinary field by challenging misleading dichotomies and examining its underlying assumptions, such as the symmetry of integration.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-03

Downloads
22 (#969,010)

6 months
11 (#338,628)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Przemysław Nowakowski
Polish Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

Around "Deconstruction." Author’s Response.David J. Gunkel - 2023 - Studia Philosophiae Christianae 59 (2):7-20.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemic Trespassing.Nathan Ballantyne - 2019 - Mind 128 (510):367-395.
The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective.George A. Miller - 2003 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (3):141-144.
The Mind's New Science.[author unknown] - 1985
Philosophy of interdisciplinarity. What? Why? How?Uskali Mäki - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (3):327-342.
Interdisciplinary success without integration.Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (3):343-360.

View all 13 references / Add more references