A conceptual framework for legal personality and its application to AI

Jurisprudence 13 (2):194-219 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we provide an analysis of the concept of legal personality and discuss whether personality may be conferred on artificial intelligence systems (AIs). Legal personality will be presented as a doctrinal category that holds together bundles of rights and obligations; as a result, we first frame it as a node of inferential links between factual preconditions and legal effects. However, this inferentialist reading does not account for the ‘background reasons’ of legal personality, i.e., it does not explain why we cluster different situations under this doctrinal category and how extra-legal information is integrated into it. We argue that one way to account for this background is to adopt a neoinstitutional perspective and to update the ontology of legal concepts with a further layer, the meta-institutional one. We finally argue that meta-institutional concepts can also support us in finding an equilibrium around the legal-policy choices that are involved in including (or not including) AIs among legal persons.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Legal concepts as inferential nodes and ontological categories.Giovanni Sartor - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (3):217-251.
Are Legal Concepts Embedded in Legal Norms?Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki & Mateusz Klinowski - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (4):553-562.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-10

Downloads
361 (#79,410)

6 months
182 (#19,303)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Claudio Novelli
Yale University

References found in this work

Ground by Law.Gideon Rosen - 2017 - Philosophical Issues 27 (1):279-301.
Anchoring versus Grounding: Reply to Schaffer.Brian Epstein - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (3):768-781.
Rules and practices.Hubert Schwyzer - 1969 - Philosophical Review 78 (4):451-467.

View all 10 references / Add more references