The impossible process: Thermodynamic reversibility

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 55:43-61 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Standard descriptions of thermodynamically reversible processes attribute contradictory properties to them: they are in equilibrium yet still change their state. Or they are comprised of non-equilibrium states that are so close to equilibrium that the difference does not matter. One cannot have states that both change and no not change at the same time. In place of this internally contradictory characterization, the term “thermodynamically reversible process” is here construed as a label for a set of real processes of change involving only non-equilibrium states. The properties usually attributed to a thermodynamically reversible process are recovered as the limiting properties of this set. No single process, that is, no system undergoing change, equilibrium or otherwise, carries those limiting properties. The paper concludes with an historical survey of characterizations of thermodynamically reversible processes and a critical analysis of their shortcomings.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brownian Computation Is Thermodynamically Irreversible.John D. Norton - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (11):1-27.
The problem of equilibrium processes in thermodynamics.David A. Lavis - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62:136-144.
The Ultimate of Reality: Reversible Causality.Azamat Sh Abdoullaev - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 10:1-8.
Process and Change: From a Thermodynamic Perspective.Paul Needham - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):395-422.
Landauer defended: Reply to Norton.James A. C. Ladyman & Katie Robertson - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (3):263-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-03-06

Downloads
49 (#447,639)

6 months
12 (#296,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John D. Norton
University of Pittsburgh

References found in this work

Bluff Your Way in the Second Law of Thermodynamics.Jos Uffink - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32 (3):305-394.
Why Thought Experiments Do Not Transcend Empiricism.John D. Norton - 2004 - In Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Malden, MA: Blackwell. pp. 44-66.
Rational Thermodynamics.C. Truesdell - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (2):305-306.
Infinite Idealizations.John D. Norton - 2012 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 17:197-210.

View all 15 references / Add more references