Teaching “Against Marriage," or, "But, Professor, marriage isn't a contract!"

In Stephen Scales, Adam Potthast & Linda Oravecz, The Ethics of the Family. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 121-132 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this contribution, I advocate diminishing the vision of marriage as an isolated and perfectly free choice between two individuals in love, in order to unseat the extent to which students resist the view that marriage is, among other things, a social contract. I summarize views of Immanuel Kant and Claudia Card, then describe my class presentation of the social significance of marriage. I conclude that students at an individualistic and self-creating point in their lives can be under-appreciative of what their public avowals mean to others, and marriage, in one sense, is indeed public.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-30

Downloads
518 (#57,937)

6 months
78 (#81,233)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kathryn J. Norlock
Trent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references