A flawed argument for perdurance – reply to braddon-Mitchell and Miller

Analysis 65 (2):164-166 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1467-8284.2005.00544.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The loneliness of stages.David Braddon-Mitchell & Kristie Miller - 2004 - Analysis 64 (3):235-242.
A flawed argument for perdurance.Harold Noonan - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):213-215.
Hume on knowledge. Harold W. Noonan.P. J. E. Kail - 2001 - Mind 110 (440):1102-1105.
Return of the living dead: reply to Braddon-Mitchell.Fabrice Correia & Sven Rosenkranz - 2015 - Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 9.
Personal Identity, by Harold W. Noonan. [REVIEW]E. J. Lowe - 1990 - Mind 99 (395):477-479.
The real but dead past: A reply to braddon-Mitchell.Peter Forrest - 2004 - Analysis 64 (4):358–362.
Harold W. Noonan, Frege: A Critical Introduction. [REVIEW]Robert Harnish - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22:434-436.
A Further Reply to Noonan.B. J. Garrett - 1987 - Analysis 47 (4):204 - 207.
Reply to Noonan.E. J. Lowe - 1987 - Analysis 47 (4):201 - 203.
Reply to Noonan on Vague Identity.E. J. Lowe - 1997 - Analysis 57 (1):88-91.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
123 (#176,356)

6 months
8 (#575,465)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Harold Noonan
Nottingham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical papers.David Kellogg Lewis - 1983 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A flawed argument for perdurance.Harold Noonan - 2003 - Analysis 63 (3):213-215.

Add more references