Defending embryo experimentation

Abstract

In Embryo: A Defense of Human Life (Doubleday, 2008), Robert P. George and Christopher Tollefsen argue that human embryo-destructive experimentation is morally wrong and should not be supported with state funds. I argue that their arguments fail.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Embryo: A Defense of Human Life by Robert P. George and Christopher Tollefsen.Alfred Cioffi - 2008 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 8 (2):388-390.
Response to Buckle.David S. Oderberg - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (3):166-166.
IVF technology and the argument from potential.Peter Singer & Karen Dawson - 1988 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 17 (2):87-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-05

Downloads
43 (#522,599)

6 months
3 (#1,480,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Nobis
Morehouse College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references