Arrogance of 'but all you need is a good index finger: A narrative ethics exploration of lack of universal funding of PSA screening in Canada

Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 46 (4):249-252 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This narrative ethics exploration stems from my happy prostate-specific antigen story, though it should not have been, as I annually refuse my family physician’s recommendation to purchase PSA screening. The reason for my refusal is I teach ethics to medical students and of course must walk the talk, and PSA screening is not publicly funded in the province of Ontario, Canada. In addition, I might have taken false comfort in ‘but all you need is a good index finger’ to detect prostate cancer, expounded by a senior physician at a national medical conference in 2010, and applauded by the large audience of physicians. I was compelled to begin this exploration out of survivor guilt, although I will not be a survivor for long, and as a mea culpa to the men similarly situated to me in having late diagnosis of prostate cancer, aggressive tumours and multiple metastases, but who unlike me are dead because they did not experience the physician–educator-based exceptionisms and coincidences that permit me to still be alive. Although my PSA story will always be a happy story, even when my life ends in a few years, the initiation of public funding of PSA screening for all men over 50 would make my PSA story an even happier story.

Other Versions

original Nisker, Jeff (2020) "Arrogance of ‘but all you need is a good index finger’: A narrative ethics exploration of lack of universal funding of PSA screening in Canada". Journal of Medical Ethics 46(4):249-252

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Just caring: screening needs limits.Leonard Michael Fleck - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (4):253-254.
What's Wrong With Chemoprevention of Prostate Cancer?Stewart Justman - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (12):21-25.
Invisible Harm.Kimberly Zieselman - 2015 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 5 (2):122-125.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-04-09

Downloads
20 (#1,119,193)

6 months
5 (#826,666)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Just caring: screening needs limits.Leonard Michael Fleck - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (4):253-254.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references