Improving Strong Negation

Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):951-977 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Strong negation is a well-known alternative to the standard negation in intuitionistic logic. It is defined virtually by giving falsity conditions to each of the connectives. Among these, the falsity condition for implication appears to unnecessarily deviate from the standard negation. In this paper, we introduce a slight modification to strong negation, and observe its comparative advantages over the original notion. In addition, we consider the paraconsistent variants of our modification, and study their relationship with non-constructive principles and connexivity.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,824

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-08

Downloads
27 (#924,850)

6 months
1 (#1,602,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Modal logic.Yde Venema - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (2):286-289.
Constructible falsity.David Nelson - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):16-26.
Constructible falsity and inexact predicates.Ahmad Almukdad & David Nelson - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1):231-233.
Connexive implication.Storrs Mccall - 1966 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (3):415-433.
Constructivism in Mathematics, An Introduction.A. Troelstra & D. Van Dalen - 1991 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 53 (3):569-570.

View all 19 references / Add more references