Do internal due process system permit adequate political and moral space for ethics voice, praxis, and community?

Journal of Business Ethics 24 (1):1 - 27 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Internal due process systems are the formal mechanisms thatmany organizations use to address and resolve ethics conflicts.Problematical due process systems such asinvestigation-punishment and grievance-arbitration systemsnarrowly constrain the political and moral space needed formeaningful ethics voice, praxis, and community. The relativelyuncommon employee board and mediator-counselor types of systemscan help solve such problems. The employee board andmediator-counselor systems permit questioning not only of guiltwith respect to policy violations but also the appropriateness ofthe policies as well as potential biases in an organization'sembedded tradition-system that may be contributing to unethicalbehavior. Theoretical implications for organization ethics,praxis, community, and integrative social contracts theories areexplored. Several case examples are discussed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Internal Due-Process Systems.Richard P. Nielsen - 1996 - The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:157-186.
The moral foundation of employee rights.John R. Rowan - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 24 (4):355 - 361.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
43 (#561,266)

6 months
3 (#1,144,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?