Defending Hume’s Theory of Personal Identity and Discarding the Appendix

Ostium 12 (2) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since his contribution to the field of personal identity in 1738 Hume’s theory has been debated thoroughly. Throughout the years there have been multiple critiques of Hume’s theory, but despite the fact that all of these generally appear unsatisfactory, Hume’s theory of personal identity is far from being a popular one in the field. I believe the blame partly falls on Hume himself. Hume’s appendix to Treaties is most often read as expressing a deep concern regarding his own theory, and this concern, I believe, is to blame for his theory never gaining the respect it deserves. After all, why should we listen to Hume if he himself found his theory lacking? It is, however, a mistake to judge Hume’s theory of personal identity, based on the appendix to Treaties. The appendix is far too ambiguity for any real conclusion and it offers nothing that cannot be found in the original chapter on personal identity from Treaties.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-02

Downloads
96 (#219,962)

6 months
15 (#208,967)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lasse B. N. B.N. Nielsen
Palacky University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man.Thomas Reid - 1785 - University Park, Pa.: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Derek R. Brookes & Knud Haakonssen.
Hume on Personal Identity.David Pears - 1993 - Hume Studies 19 (2):289-299.
Hume on Identity.Wan-Chuan Fang - 1984 - Hume Studies 10 (1):59-68.

View all 8 references / Add more references