Indivisible Lines

Classical Quarterly 30 (2):120-126 (1936)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The name of Democritus can claim a place in any discussion of indivisibles. Yet its introduction in this paper seems to depend on the lucus a non lucendo principle; for Democritus did not believe in the existence of indivisible lines. Nowhere is the belief ascribed to him and in at least one place it is implicitly denied, the scholion on De Caelo 268a 1, which says he made his elements indivisible solids, as contrasted with lines or surfaces. Two passages, one from Plutarch, the other from Simplicius, will show why he could not believe in indivisible lines

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
43 (#518,085)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Clotho’ Spindle: Xenocrates’ Doctrine of Indivisibles.Olga Alieva - 2023 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105 (4):567-590.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Zeno of Elea. A Text, with Translation and Notes. [REVIEW]R. S. - 1936 - Journal of Philosophy 33 (13):358-358.

Add more references