- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Individual differences transcend the rationality debate
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):530-531 (2003)
Abstract
Individual differences are indeed an important aid to our understanding of human cognition, but the importance of the rationality debate is open to question. An understanding of the process involved, and how and why differences occur, is fundamental to our understanding of human reasoning and decision making.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
On the distinction between rationality and intelligence: Implications for understanding individual differences in reasoning.Keith E. Stanovich - 2012 - The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-A psychological point of view: Violations of rational rules as a diagnostic of mental processes.K. E. Stanovich, R. F. West & D. Kalmeman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):681-682.
Patterns of individual differences and rational choice.Vittorio Girotto - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):674-675.
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?Keith E. Stanovich & Richard F. West - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):645-665.
Individual differences and Pearson's r: Rationality revealed?Joachim Krueger - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):684-685.
Diversity in reasoning and rationality: Metacognitive and developmental considerations.David Moshman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):689-690.
Resource-rationality beyond individual minds: the case of interactive language use.Mark Dingemanse - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43:e9.
Evolutionary theory and the social sciences.Robert L. Burgess & Peter C. M. Molenaar - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):20-21.
An elitist naturalistic fallacy and the automatic-controlled continuum.Sandra L. Schneider - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):695-696.
Differences, games, and pluralism.Roger A. McCain - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):688-689.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
45 (#493,054)
6 months
10 (#407,001)
2009-01-28
Downloads
45 (#493,054)
6 months
10 (#407,001)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-54ff658c48-mmr56 uwo