Teens and Research

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):659-673 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract:On seeing promising results in a small number of patients, some researchers are conducting trials to determine whether deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN). This article asks whether we should open enrollment in trials of DBS for AN to adolescents. Despite concerns about informed consent, parental consent, and unforeseeable psychological sequelae, the article concludes that the risks to anorexic adolescents associated with participation in trials of DBS are reasonable considering the substantial risks of not enrolling teens with AN in research on DBS. The seriousness of AN, its high incidence in teens, and serious shortfalls in the AN treatment literature point to the need for improved, evidence-based treatments for teens with AN. This unmet need generates an obligation on the part of researchers and physicians to promote and conduct research on AN in adolescents.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deep Brain Stimulation, Continuity over Time, and the True Self.Sven Nyholm & Elizabeth O’Neill - 2016 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (4):647-658.
New Therapies, Old Problems, or, A Plea for Neuromodesty.Stephen J. Morse - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 3 (1):60-64.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-06

Downloads
14 (#1,283,901)

6 months
7 (#728,225)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?