" Which side Spinoza would have taken (between Einstein and bohr) if he had lived to see the (scientific) development of our days": An analysis of human representation of the physical reality

In S. Smets J. P. Van Bendegem G. C. Cornelis (ed.), Metadebates on Science. VUB-Press & Kluwer. pp. 6--243 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Science without representation.Richard Healey - 2010 - Analysis 70 (3):536-547.
Bohr as a Phenomenological Realist.Towfic Shomar - 2008 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 39 (2):321-349.
When champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr–Einstein debate.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (1):212-242.
Bohr, Einstein and Realism.Wojciech Daniel - 1989 - Dialectica 43 (3):249-261.
Einstein.Christopher Ray - 2000 - In W. Newton-Smith (ed.), A companion to the philosophy of science. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. pp. 102–107.
Bohr e Einstein: Filosofia, Debate e Controvérsia.Rodolfo Petrônio da Costa - 2018 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 74 (1):279-294.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references