Sexual Abuse, Modern Freedom, and Heidegger’s Philosophy

Social Philosophy Today 27:111-126 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The sexual abuse of women and girls, such as sexual harassment, battery, varieties of rape, prostitution, and pornography, is statistically pervasive in late modern society. Yet this fact does not register adequate ethical concern. I explore this gap in moral perception. I argue that sexual abuse is conceptually supported by an ontology of women that considers a lack of bodily integrity as natural and by a sex-specific idea of freedom that considers sexual violations as liberating. This conceptual framework is pernicious because it supports abuse and interferes with our moral perception of harm, encouraging us to see harms as normal and as positive. I argue that Heidegger’s idea of philosophy and the resources of his epistemological and ontological project in Being and Time can help show the pernicious function of this conceptual framework and thus help us better understand this abuse.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,130

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-18

Downloads
108 (#196,638)

6 months
8 (#574,086)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Natalie Nenadic
University of Kentucky

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references