Newman's dispute with Locke

Journal of the History of Philosophy 11 (4):453-457 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Locke. By R. S. Woolhouse. [REVIEW]Robert B. Ashmore - 1986 - Modern Schoolman 63 (2):151-153.
Locke on abstraction: A response to M. R. Ayers.Jonathan Walmsley - 1999 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (1):123 – 134.
Cardinal Newman, Reformed Epistemologist?Stephen R. Grimm - 2001 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 75 (4):497-522.
Peter R. Anstey. John Locke and Natural Philosophy. Pp. xii+252. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. $65.00. [REVIEW]Benjamin Hill - 2012 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 2 (2):382-387.
John Locke. By R. I. Aaron.J. O. Urmson - 1956 - Philosophy 31 (116):93-.
Cardinal Newman’s Philosophy of Belief.J. D. Bastable - 1955 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 5:44-70.
A Preface to Newman’s Theology.J. D. Bastable - 1952 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 2:155-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#453,027)

6 months
20 (#147,197)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references