A Philosophy of the Screenplay

Routledge (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, scholars in a variety of disciplines—including philosophy, film and media studies, and literary studies—have become interested in the aesthetics, definition, and ontology of the screenplay. To this end, this volume addresses the fundamental philosophical questions about the nature of the screenplay: What is a screenplay? Is the screenplay art—more specifically, literature? What kind of a thing is a screenplay? Nannicelli argues that the screenplay is a kind of artefact; as such, its boundaries are determined collectively by screenwriters, and its ontological nature is determined collectively by both writers and readers of screenplays. Any plausible philosophical account of the screenplay must be strictly constrained by our collective creative and appreciative practices, and must recognize that those practices indicate that at least some screenplays are artworks.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Is a Screenplay?Ted Nannicelli - 2019 - In Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa & Shawn Loht (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures. Springer. pp. 215-234.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-02-15

Downloads
82 (#257,468)

6 months
4 (#1,272,377)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ted Nannicelli
University of Queensland

Citations of this work

What Instances of Novels Are.Alexey Aliyev - 2017 - Philosophia 45 (1):163-183.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references