Abstract

In this article, I diagnose a key weakness in contemporary defenses of transformative prefigurative politics: they appear to expect existing institutions, like the existing state, to erode or change in tandem with prefigurative experimentation, opening them to be dismissed as implausible. Though some abjure engagement with existing state power while others embrace it, both appear to assume state power will have a given effect on prefigurative experimentation, and their theories of social transformation seem to turn on these assumptions. To address this shortcoming, I turn to the political thought of M.K. Gandhi. Unlike contemporary theorists, Gandhi connects his theory of prefigurative construction to his theory of noncooperation, which explains the intentional breaking of institutions. In providing a theory of the destructive moment of social transformation, Gandhi reconciles his state-skepticism with his limited embrace of the state, which contemporary defenses of prefigurative politics struggle to do. Because he understands state power as conditional on cooperation, Gandhi accounts for both the constructive and destructive moments of social transformation and provides a theory less likely to be dismissed. His example, I argue, is instructive for defenders of prefigurative politics today, especially as they think through working with and against the existing state.