A rejoinder to Putnam

Journal of Philosophy 62 (16):429-432 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,505

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ernest Nagel.Patrick Suppes - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy 109 (8-9):470-478.
Ernest Nagel and Reduction.Kenneth F. Schaffner - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy 109 (8-9):534-565.
Gödel, Nagel, Minds, and Machines.Solomon Feferman - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy 106 (4):201-219.
Gödel's Proof. Ernest Nagel, James R. Newman. [REVIEW]Hilary Putnam - 1960 - Philosophy of Science 27 (2):205-207.
Ernest Nagel," The Cognitive Status of Theories.E. Nagel - 2001 - In Yuri Balashov & Alexander Rosenberg (eds.), Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 197.
A rejoinder.Arthur E. Murphy - 1933 - Journal of Philosophy 30 (13):354-358.
A rejoinder to professor Lee.James B. Olmstead - 1953 - Journal of Philosophy 50 (26):811-814.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
38 (#595,594)

6 months
7 (#718,806)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Five arguments against Craigian transcriptionism.C. A. Hooker - 1968 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 46 (3):265 – 276.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references