Psychological models of art reception must be empirically grounded

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40:e371 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We commend Menninghaus et al. for tackling the role of negative emotions in art reception. However, their model suffers from shortcomings that reduce its applicability to empirical studies of the arts: poor use of evidence, lack of integration with other models, and limited derivation of testable hypotheses. We argue that theories about art experiences should be based on empirical evidence.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neuroaesthetics edited by skov, martin and oshin vartanian.Vincent Bergeron - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):191-192.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-02

Downloads
32 (#704,694)

6 months
10 (#402,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references