On Norton’s “…Shook…” and Myrvold’s “Shakin’…”

Philosophy of Physics 1 (1) (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Norton’s and Myrvold’s recent analyses of fluctuations and Landauer’s principle are compatible.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bayesianism and unification: A reply to Wayne Myrvold.Marc Lange - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (2):205-215.
Turning Norton’s Dome Against Material Induction.Richard Dawid - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (9):1101-1109.
For Universal Rules, Against Induction.John Worrall - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):740-753.
Shakin’ All Over: Proving Landauer’s Principle without Neglect of Fluctuations.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2024 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 75 (3):587-616.
Causality and dispersion: A reply to John Norton.Mathias Frisch - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):487 - 495.
Information-Theoretic Statistical Mechanics without Landauer’s Principle.Daniel Parker - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (4):831-856.
Landauer defended: Reply to Norton.James A. C. Ladyman & Katie Robertson - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (3):263-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-30

Downloads
16 (#1,201,099)

6 months
5 (#1,067,832)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references