On the tension between Tarski's nominalism and his model theory (definitions for a mathematical model of knowledge)

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 126 (1-3):215-224 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The nominalistic ontology of Kotarbinski, Slupecki and Tarski does not provide any direct interpretations of the sets of higher types which play important roles in type theory and in set theory. For this and other reasons I will interpret those theories as descriptions of some finite structures which are actually constructed in human imaginations and stored in their memories. Those structures will be described in this lecture. They are hinted by the idea of Skolem functions and Hilbert's -symbols, and they constitute a finitistic modification of Tarski's concept of a model. They suggest also a form of the evolutionary process which leads to the development of human intelligence and language.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,507

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Tarski's definition and truth-makers.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 126 (1-3):57-76.
What languages have Tarski truth definitions?Wilfrid Hodges - 2004 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 126 (1-3):93-113.
Recursive functions and existentially closed structures.Emil Jeřábek - 2019 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 20 (1):2050002.
Remarks on Tarski’s Nominalism.Daniel Nagase - 2023 - Cognitio 24 (1):e58224.
Tarski.Benedict Eastaugh - 2017 - In Alex Malpass & Marianna Antonutti Marfori, The History of Philosophical and Formal Logic: From Aristotle to Tarski. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 293-313.
Tarski - a dilemma.Richard C. Jennings - 1987 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 30 (1 & 2):155 – 172.
Truth definitions, Skolem functions and axiomatic set theory.Jaakko Hintikka - 1998 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 4 (3):303-337.
Tarski on logical notions.Luca Bellotti - 2003 - Synthese 135 (3):401 - 413.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
58 (#402,693)

6 months
7 (#609,087)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What connectionist models learn.Susan Hanson & D. Burr - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Locally finite theories.Jan Mycielski - 1986 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1):59-62.

Add more references