- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Deductivism Surpassed: Or, Foxing in its Margins? [Book Review]
Abstract
John Fox argued that deductivism must be supplemented with ‘epistemic syllogisms’, non-deductive arguments whose vindication is trivial if deductivism is correct. I resist this attempt to surpass deductivismOther Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Deductivism as an interpretative strategy: A reply to Groarke's defense of reconstructive deductivism.David Godden - 2005 - Argumentation and Advocacy: Journal of the American Forensic Association 41:168-183.
The Value of Methodological Deductivism in Argument Construction.Fábio Perin Shecaira - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (4):471-501.
Certainty and Error in Mathematics: Deductivism and the Claims of Mathematical Fallibilism.Ian J. Dove - 2004 - Dissertation, Rice University
Relevance logic brings hope to hypothetico-deductivism.C. Kenneth Waters - 1987 - Philosophy of Science 54 (3):453-464.
Deduction without Dogmas:The Case of Moral Analogical Argumentation.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (3):311-336.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-02-19
Downloads
85 (#254,793)
6 months
7 (#469,699)
2012-02-19
Downloads
85 (#254,793)
6 months
7 (#469,699)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Changing Philosophy Through Technology: Complexity and Computer-Supported Collaborative Argument Mapping.Michael H. G. Hoffmann - 2015 - Philosophy and Technology 28 (2):167-188.
Abduction, Complex Inferences, and Emergent Heuristics of Scientific Inquiry.John R. Shook - 2016 - Axiomathes 26 (2):157-186.
References found in this work
Mill's sins or Mayo's errors?Peter Achinstein - 2009 - In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos, Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Induction and Severe Testing.Peter Achinstein - 2009 - In Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos, Error and Inference: Recent Exchanges on Experimental Reasoning, Reliability, and the Objectivity and Rationality of Science. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 170.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-xhc6d uwo