A relational formulation of the theory of types

Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (3):325 - 346 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper developes a relational---as opposed to a functional---theory of types. The theory is based on Hilbert and Bernays' eta operator plus the identity symbol, from which Church's lambda and the other usual operators are then defined. The logic is intended for use in the semantics of natural language.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
125 (#174,606)

6 months
16 (#189,412)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Reinhard Muskens
University of Amsterdam

Citations of this work

Abstract objects.Gideon Rosen - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Propositions and Cognitive Relations.Nicholas K. Jones - 2019 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119 (2):157-178.
Intensional models for the theory of types.Reinhard Muskens - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (1):98-118.
Categorial Grammar and Type Theory.Johan Van Benthem - 1990 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 19 (2):115-168.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Elements of symbolic logic.Hans Reichenbach - 1980 - London: Dover Publications.
Generalized quantifiers and natural language.John Barwise & Robin Cooper - 1981 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (2):159--219.
Situations and Attitudes.Jon Barwise - 1981 - Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):668.
The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English.Richard Montague - 1973 - In Patrick Suppes, Julius Moravcsik & Jaakko Hintikka (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht. pp. 221--242.

View all 31 references / Add more references