The Δεύτερος Πλος in the Phaedo

Classical Quarterly 30 (2):40-47 (1936)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I am merely analysing the meaning of Phaedo 99–107 without discussing either its historical significance or its value as a contribution to the logic of science. The paper attempts in fact to be little more than a paraphrase of the Greek, which aims only at accuracy of statement, but I am adding in the third section a note on the relation of this passage to the discussion of method in Republic VI, mainly in order to minimize its relevance. The first section of the paper deals with the linguistic analysis of the text, the second, very sketchily, with the general doctrine

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Duty and Interest: (I).W. D. Lamont - 1941 - Philosophy 16 (64):339 - 355.
Divine Simplicity.William E. Mann - 1982 - Religious Studies 18 (4):451 - 471.
Assertion and its Social Significance: An Introduction.Bianca Cepollaro, Paolo Labinaz & Neri Marsili - 2019 - Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio 13 (1):1-18.
The logic of psychological concepts.Gustav Bergmann - 1951 - Philosophy of Science 18 (2):93-110.
The Last Argument of Plato's Phaedo. I.D. O'Brien - 1967 - Classical Quarterly 17 (02):198-.
Directival Theory of Meaning Resurrected.Paweł Grabarczyk - 2017 - Studia Semiotyczne—English Supplement 29 (1):62-81.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
27 (#826,352)

6 months
6 (#861,180)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references