Testing as a selection tool: Another old and sticky managerial human rights issue [Book Review]

Journal of Business Ethics 8 (10):817 - 820 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The intent of this paper is to state testing's definition and purpose within the selection process. A brief review of the current trend toward the increased use of testing in the selection process. An actual example of the increased use of testing in both the public and private sector is illustrated. Some discussion regarding future trends of testing — Genetic Screening, Personality Test, Honesty Test, etc. are also presented as issues of concern.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00383781

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 104,381

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Private and public eugenics: Genetic testing and screening in india. [REVIEW]Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
Eugenics or Not, Prenatal Genetic Testing’s Common Issues Need to Be Addressed.Mark W. Leach - 2021 - In Megan A. Allyse & Marsha Michie, Born Well: Prenatal Genetics and the Future of Having Children. Springer Verlag. pp. 33-44.
Commercial predictive testing: the desirability of one overseeing body.R. Hoedemaekers - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (4):282-286.
The ethical challenges of direct-to-consumer genetic testing.Cheryl Berg & Kelly Fryer-Edwards - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 77 (1):17 - 31.
Providing genetic testing through the private sector: a view from Canada.Bryn Williams-Jones, Timothy Caulfield & Michael M. Burgess - 2001 - ISUMA: Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2 (3):72-81.
Prospects for limiting access to prenatal genetic information about Down syndrome in light of the expansion of prenatal genomics.Chris Kaposy - 2022 - The New Bioethics 29 (3):226-246.
Avoiding ‘selection’?—References to history in current German policy debates about non-invasive prenatal testing.Hannes Foth - 2021 - Bioethics 35 (6):518-527.
Genetic Testing and Screening of Children.M. B. Menzel & V. N. Madrigal - 2021 - In Nico Nortjé & Johan C. Bester, Pediatric Ethics: Theory and Practice. Springer Verlag. pp. 313-328.
Genetic Testing and Genetic Screening.Pat Milmoe McCarrick - 1993 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 3 (3):333-354.
Privacy and the human genome project.David L. Wiesenthal & Neil I. Wiener - 1996 - Ethics and Behavior 6 (3):189 – 202.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
46 (#529,384)

6 months
4 (#994,329)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The new professor of theology.Jim Mackenzie - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 28 (1):5–15.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references