Carroll’s Infinite Regress and the Act of Diagramming

Topoi 38 (3):619-626 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The infinite regress of Carroll’s ‘What the Tortoise said to Achilles’ is interpreted as a problem in the epistemology of mathematical proof. An approach to the problem that is both diagrammatic and non-logical is presented with respect to a specific inference of elementary geometry.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,667

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reasoning without regress.Luis Rosa - 2019 - Synthese 196 (6):2263-2278.
The Virtuous Tortoise.David Botting - 2015 - Philosophical Investigations 40 (1):31-39.
Logical Inference and Its Dynamics.Carlotta Pavese - 2016 - In Olivier Roy, Allard Tamminga & Malte Willer (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. London, UK: College Publications. pp. 203-219.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-16

Downloads
38 (#597,502)

6 months
6 (#879,768)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What The Tortoise Said To Achilles.Lewis Carroll - 1895 - Mind 104 (416):691-693.
The Euclidean Diagram.Kenneth Manders - 2008 - In Paolo Mancosu (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. pp. 80--133.
Proofs, pictures, and Euclid.John Mumma - 2010 - Synthese 175 (2):255 - 287.
A formal system for euclid’s elements.Jeremy Avigad, Edward Dean & John Mumma - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (4):700--768.

View all 12 references / Add more references