Manufacturing Consent: A corpus‐based critical discourse analysis of New Labour's educational governance

Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (6):562-578 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents selected findings from a historical analysis of change in the discursive construction of social identity in UK education policy discourse from 1972–2005. My chief argument is that through its linguistic forms of self-identification the government construes educational roles, relations and responsibilities not only for itself, but also for other educational actors and wider society. More specifically, I argue that New Labour's distinctive mode of self-representation is an important element in its hegemonic project, textually manufacturing consent over its policy decisions, and helping to articulate its self-styled ‘enabling’ model of governance. As evidence for these claims I discuss two prominent trends in New Labour's education policy rhetoric, which I characterise as ‘personalisation’ and ‘managerialisation’. Respectively, these relate to the discursive representation of social identity and social action

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The grammar of governance.Jane Mulderrig - 2011 - Critical Discourse Studies 8 (1):45-68.
Diffraction as a Method of Critical Policy Analysis.Jasmine B. Ulmer - 2016 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 48 (13):1381-1394.
How to conceive of critical educational theory today?Jan Masschelein - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (3):351–367.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-14

Downloads
77 (#272,018)

6 months
12 (#294,748)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?