Strong and weak heterogeneity in Berkeley's New theory of vision

In Stephen Hartley Daniel, New interpretations of Berkeley's thought. Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,951

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Molyneux’s Question in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.Juan R. Loaiza - 2017 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 32 (2):231-247.
Berkeley's realism.Charles J. McCracken - 2008 - In Stephen Hartley Daniel, New interpretations of Berkeley's thought. Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1 (#1,967,474)

6 months
1 (#1,602,128)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Muehlmann
University of Western Ontario

Citations of this work

Molyneux’s Question in Berkeley’s Theory of Vision.Juan R. Loaiza - 2017 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 32 (2):231-247.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references