- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Ethics of Mechanical Restraints
Hastings Center Report 21 (1):22-25 (1991)
Abstract
As mechanical restraints have never been proven effective in clinical practice, they should not be used routinely. They should be considered a non‐validated therapy requiring consent.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Critique of Clinical Equipoise: Therapeutic Misconception in the Ethics of Clinical Trials.Franklin G. Miller & Howard Brody - 2003 - Hastings Center Report 33 (3):19-28.
Exploring the ethics of physical restraints: Students’ questioning.Maki Tanaka - 2023 - Nursing Ethics 30 (3):408-422.
Implantable Brain Chips? Time for Debate.G. Q. Maguire & Ellen M. McGee - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (1):7-13.
Genug ist Genug: A Fetus Is Not a Kidney.Kathleen Nolan - 1988 - Hastings Center Report 18 (6):13-19.
For Experts Only? Access to Hospital Ethics Committees.George J. Agich & Stuart J. Youngner - 1991 - Hastings Center Report 21 (5):17-24.
A “Fair Use” Exception for Public Health Uses of Medical Information?Jessica Berg - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (3):13-14.
Cases in Bioethics from the Hastings Center Report.Laurence B. McCullough, Alastair Campbell, Roger Higgs, Colleen D. Clements, Carol Levine & Robert M. Veatch - 1983 - Hastings Center Report 13 (5):42.
Waving Goodbye to Waivers of Consent.Jeffrey R. Botkin - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (6):inside back cover-inside back co.
Toward Meeting the Obligation of Respect for Persons in Pragmatic Clinical Trials.Stephanie R. Morain, Stephanie A. Kraft, Benjamin S. Wilfond, Amy Mcguire, Neal W. Dickert, Andrew Garland & Jeremy Sugarman - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (3):9-17.
Analytics
Added to PP
2013-11-22
Downloads
31 (#718,254)
6 months
8 (#551,658)
2013-11-22
Downloads
31 (#718,254)
6 months
8 (#551,658)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Nurses’ ethical reasoning in cases of physical restraint in acute elderly care: a qualitative study.Sabine Goethals, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé & Chris Gastmans - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):983-991.
Exercising restraint: autonomy, welfare and elderly patients.S. Dodds - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (3):160-163.
Artificial nutrition and hydration in the patient with advanced dementia: is withholding treatment compatible with traditional Judaism?Muriel R. Gillick - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (1):12-15.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-f8568656d-kkgnk uwo