Whodunit? Causal Responsibility of Utilization Review for Physicians'Decisions, Patients'Outcomes

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 20 (1-2):40-56 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the “olden days,” only a few years ago, physicians were free to order virtually any service they believed their patients needed, confident that virtually everything would be paid for. Reimbursernent was retrospective, fee-for-service and generous, essentially a cost-plus system in which insurers only rarely challenged medical decisions. That system is now gone. Uncontrolled escalations in the cost of health care have prompted those who pay its costs—primarily governments, businesses, and insurers—to initiate a broad array of cost controls in hopes of at least restraining the rise of their expenditures, even if not actually reducing them. Among the most prominent cost-containment mechanisms is utilization review (UR).Insurers have always engaged in retrospective review, denying payment for services that are not medically necessary, or not covered by the patient's policy, or not documented in the patient's records. Recently, however, payers have added prospective review, in which physician and patient must secure advance payer approval for certain interventions if they wish to ensure reimbursement.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,237

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Cost-Containment: Bureaucratic Medicine and the Doctor as Patient-Advocate.Barry Furrow - 1988 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 3 (2):187-226.
Private Gain and Public Pain: Financing American Health Care.Bruce Siegel, Holly Mead & Robert Burke - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):644-651.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-31

Downloads
36 (#658,719)

6 months
2 (#1,294,541)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Causation in the Law.F. S. McNeilly - 1959 - Philosophy 37 (139):83-84.
Causation in the Law.F. S. McNeilly - 1962 - Philosophical Quarterly 12 (46):92-94.
A Physician's Reflections.Robert A. Berenson - 1989 - Hastings Center Report 19 (1):12-15.

Add more references