“The Only Feasible Means”: The Pentagon's Ambivalent Relationship with the Nuremberg Code

Hastings Center Report 26 (5):11-19 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Convinced that armed conflict with the Soviet Union was all but inevitable, that such conflict would involve unconventional atomic, biological, and chemical warfare, and that research with human subjects was essential to respond to the threat, in the early 1950s the U.S. Department of Defense promulgated a policy governing human experimentation based on the Nuremberg Code. Yet the policymaking process focused on the abstract issue of whether human experiments should go forward at all, ignoring the reality of humans subjects research already under way and leaving unanswered ethical questions about how to conduct such research. Documents newly released to the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments tell the story of the Pentagon policy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
Revising the History of Cold War Research Ethics.Susan E. Lederer & Jonathan D. Moreno - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):223-237.
Regulating Experimentation in Research and Medical Practice.Paul Ulhas Macneill - 1998 - In Helga Kuhse & Peter Singer (eds.), A Companion to Bioethics. Malden, Mass., USA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 469–486.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
23 (#947,988)

6 months
5 (#1,062,008)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references