Reference theories and the relevance of descriptions

Manuscrito 43 (4):74-85 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mario Gómez-Torrente is a fundamental contribution to the issue of reference and especially of reference fixing. In this article I will focus on some questions addressed in it, especially on the relationships between some components of Kripke’s, Putnam’s and Gómez-Torrente’s theories of reference fixing as well as on the relevance of descriptions for those theories; I will then make some observations about Gómez-Torrente’s view of the reference-fixing conventions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,885

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-10

Downloads
21 (#1,086,293)

6 months
3 (#1,157,458)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Luis Moreno
Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meaning and reference.Hilary Putnam - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (19):699-711.
Meaning and Reference.Hilary Putnam - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin, The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 299-308.
Explanation and reference.Hilary Putnam - 1973 - In Glenn Pearce & Patrick Maynard, Conceptual change. Boston,: D. Reidel. pp. 196--214.

View all 8 references / Add more references