Platón en la relación intelectual de Eric Voegelin y Leo Strauss

Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 28:275-302 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay examines the relationship between Eric Voegelin and Leo Strauss in order to show the central themes necessary to elucidate their philosophical positions. The essay reveals the centrality of the figure of Plato as a point of departure to understand the agreement and the disagreement concerning fundamental questions (such as the way of reading ancient texts, the importance of the historical perspective or the importance of the study of the past in order to orient the modern science) which revolves around the issue of the relation between revelation and philosophy. The work concludes with an identification of the common core of both thinkers that allows us to understand their differences (homogeneity or heterogeneity of reality and the human) and, moreover, identifies both perspectives with a «foundational» (Voegelin) or «negative» (Strauss) interpretation of Plato’s thought

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,448

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leo Strauss and Eric Voegelin on Machiavelli.Athanasios Moulakis - 2005 - European Journal of Political Theory 4 (3):249-262.
«On tyranny» by Leo Strauss.Eric Voegelin - 2011 - Russian Sociological Review 10 (3):125-130.
On the tyranny and the art of writing.Alexander Pavlov - 2011 - Russian Sociological Review 10 (3):115-124.
Disturbing Revelation: Leo Strauss, Eric Voegelin, and the Bible, by John J. Ranieri. [REVIEW]George A. Dunn - 2016 - The Bulletin of the Colloquium on Violence and Religion 50:30-34.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
91 (#228,303)

6 months
17 (#166,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Natural Right and History (Chicago, 1953).Leo Strauss - 1953 - The Correspondence Between Ethical Egoists and Natural Rights Theorists is Considerable Today, as Suggested by a Comparison of My" Recent Work in Ethical Egoism," American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):1-15.
Persecution and the art of writing.Leo Strauss - 1952 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
What is political philosophy?Leo Strauss - 1973 - Westport, Conn.,: Greenwood Press.
The city and man / Leo Strauss.Leo Strauss - 1964 - Chicago,: Rand McNally.
The political philosophy of Hobbes.Leo Strauss - 1936 - Oxford,: The Clarendon press.

View all 30 references / Add more references