A Dilemma for the Civil Disobedient: Pleading Guilty or not Guilty in the Courtroom

In Moraro Piero (ed.), The Public in Law: Representations of the Political in Legal Discourse. Ashgate. pp. 99-111 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,854

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Piero Moraro, Civil Disobedience: A Philosophical Overview.William Smith - 2022 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 16 (3):651-656.
The Guilty But Mentally Ill Verdict: Political Expediency at the Expense of Moral Principle.Mark Woodmansee - 1996 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 10 (1):341-388.
Fearless Counsel: Being an Attorney for the Civil Disobedient.Maura Doherty - 1991 - Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 5 (4):1043-1068.
Strategies for Legitimising and Delegitimising Power in Nigerian Courtroom Discourse.Anthony Elisha Anowu, Tunde Ope-Davies & Mojisola Shodipe - 2024 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 37 (2):379-398.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-01-10

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Piero Moraro
Edith Cowan University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references