Review: One or Two Dogmas of Objectivism [Book Review]

Mind 108 (430):381 - 393 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay is a critical notice of Thomas Nagel’s The Last Word. Though the essay evidences broad sympathy with the spirit of Nagel’s book, its main burden is to query the letter of the book. Nagel’s defence of the view that there are certain beliefs and ways of thinking that are not from any point of view, or that are ‘objective’ in his own terms, is criticized on the grounds that it is too facile. It is also criticized for not being pitted against a critique of beliefs and ways of thinking that are from some point of view, or that are ‘subjective’ in his terms.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

On Thomas Nagel's Objective Self.Robert C. Stalnaker - 2007 - In Robert Stalnaker, Ways a World Might Be. Oxford University Press Uk.
Thomas Nagel.Alan Thomas - 2008 - Routledge.
Writing on the page of consciousness.Christoph Hoerl - 2015 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 115 (3pt3):187-209.
Nagel's “What is it like to be a Bat” Argument against Physicalism.Amy Kind - 2011 - In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone, Just the Arguments. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley‐Blackwell. pp. 324–326.
Nagel.Sonia Sedivy - 2009 - In Christopher Belshaw & Gary Kemp, 12 Modern Philosophers. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 134–152.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
370 (#81,658)

6 months
65 (#93,361)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Augusta Moore
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references