Nominal definitions of 'culture'

Philosophy of Science 19 (4):245-256 (1952)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many social scientists report that they find it difficult to frame adequate definitions of the important terms of the field. At present they are definition-shy. It is the purpose of this paper to show that this avoidance reaction is neither necessary nor desirable as a means for advancing social science. In order that this be made clear, an analysis of an important term will be presented. First, however, a few preparatory questions about the technique of defining must be asked and answered.

Other Versions

edition Moore, Omar Khayyam; Lindley, T. Foster (1959) "Nominal Definitions of `Culture.'". Journal of Symbolic Logic 24(1):85-86

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
237 (#110,306)

6 months
10 (#404,653)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Critical note on "culture" and "learning-theory".Carl H. Hamburg - 1954 - Philosophy of Science 21 (4):344-347.
Moore's nominal definitions of 'culture'.T. Foster Lindley - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (4):335-338.
A reappraisal of the concept of 'culture'.Larry Brownstein - 1995 - Social Epistemology 9 (4):311 – 351.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references