Revisiting the censure theory of punishment

Philosophia 37 (1):125-131 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is a rejoinder to Thaddeus Metz’s article “Censure Theory Still Best Accounts for Punishment of the Guilty: Reply to Montague.” In his article, Metz attempts to answer objections to censure theory that I had raised previously. I argue in my rejoinder that Metz’s defense of censure theory remains seriously problematic despite what he says in his reply.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,757

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Censure theory and intuitions about punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):491-512.
Realism and the Censure Theory of Punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2002 - In Patricia Smith & Paolo Comanducci (eds.), Legal Philosophy: General Aspects. Franz Steiner Verlag. pp. 117-29.
How should we argue for a censure theory of punishment?Christopher Bennett - 2019 - In Antje du Bois-Pedain & Anthony E. Bottoms (eds.), Penal censure: engagements within and beyond desert theory. New York: Hart Publishing.
Reflective censure : punishment and human development.Liat Levanon - 2019 - In Antje du Bois-Pedain & Anthony E. Bottoms (eds.), Penal censure: engagements within and beyond desert theory. New York: Hart Publishing.
Suffering and punishment.Michael S. Brady - 2020 - In Amalia Amaya & Maksymilian Del Mar (eds.), Virtue, Emotion and Imagination in Law and Legal Reasoning. Chicago: Hart Publishing. pp. 139-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#462,030)

6 months
7 (#730,543)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations