IRB review and public health biobanking: a case study of the Michigan BioTrust for Health

IRB: Ethics & Human Research 34 (3):11-16 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The inauguration of Michigan’s BioTrust for Health, a research biobank for leftover neonatal blood spots, posed several novel questions for the state’s Department of Community Health institutional review board. The IRB’s response to these questions affirmed that respect for persons requires consent from donors for tissue donation to a public health biorepository with a research mission. It also acknowledged that the existence of potential risks and benefits to groups as well as to individuals necessitated new institutional collaborations between the IRB and the appointed community oversight board for the BioTrust to foster consideration of the impacts on all stakeholders

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,173

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The IRB's monitoring function: four concepts of monitoring.E. J. Heath - 1978 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 1 (5):103-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
30 (#748,172)

6 months
4 (#1,246,333)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references