- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Integrating Theory and Data in Evaluating Clinical Ethics Support. Still a Long Way to Go
Bioethics 31 (4):234-236 (2017)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Jochen Vollmann, Verena Sandow, Sabastian Wäscher, and Jan Schildmann : The ethics of personalised medicine: critical perspectives: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2015, 285 pp, ISBN: 978-1-4724-4796-8.Silviya Aleksandrova-Yankulovska - 2017 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 38 (1):89-94.
A response to Levitt and Molewijk.Lieke van der Scheer & Guy Widdershoven - 2004 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 (1):89-91.
Philosophizing Still: A Brief Reintroduction to Clinical Philosophy.Virginia L. Bartlett & Mark J. Bliton - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (12):43-46.
The practical importance of theory in clinical ethics support services.Bert Molewijk, Anne Slowther & Mark Aulisio - 2011 - Bioethics 25 (7):ii-iii.
Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Support Services: Theory, methodology & results.[author unknown] - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (9):iv-iv.
Ethical Theory as Part of Clinical Ethics Support Practice.Guy Widdershoven, Suzanne Metselaar & Bert Molewijk - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (9):34-36.
Limitations of Patient-Physician Co-Reasoning in AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support Systems.Kristin Kostick Quenet & Syed Shahzeb Ayaz - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (9):97-99.
Research, education, ethics consultation: evaluating a Bioethics Unit in an Oncological Research Hospital.Marta Perin, Elena Turola, Giovanna Artioli, Luca Ghirotto, Massimo Costantini, Morten Magelssen & Ludovica De Panfilis - 2022 - BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1):1-15.
Not There Yet: Evaluating Clinical Ethics Consultation in an Accountability Culture.Courtenay R. Bruce & Trevor M. Bibler - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (3):46-48.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-04-25
Downloads
53 (#408,500)
6 months
9 (#480,483)
2017-04-25
Downloads
53 (#408,500)
6 months
9 (#480,483)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Impact of moral case deliberation in healthcare settings: a literature review.Maaike M. Haan, Jelle L. P. van Gurp, Simone M. Naber & A. Stef Groenewoud - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):85.
Clinical ethics consultations: a scoping review of reported outcomes.Ann M. Heesters, Ruby R. Shanker, Kevin Rodrigues, Daniel Z. Buchman, Andria Bianchi, Claudia Barned, Erica Nekolaichuk, Eryn Tong, Marina Salis & Jennifer A. H. Bell - 2022 - BMC Medical Ethics 23 (1):1-65.
Field-testing the Euro-MCD Instrument: Experienced outcomes of moral case deliberation.Janine C. de Snoo-Trimp, Bert Molewijk, Gøril Ursin, Berit Støre Brinchmann, Guy A. M. Widdershoven, Henrica C. W. de Vet & Mia Svantesson - 2020 - Nursing Ethics 27 (2):390-406.
Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals’ priorities.Mia Svantesson, Janine C. de Snoo-Trimp, Göril Ursin, Henrica C. W. de Vet, Berit S. Brinchmann & Bert Molewijk - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (9):608-616.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-559df78dcc-vpvvv uwo