On absolute preference and stochastic dominance

Theory and Decision 21 (1):85-88 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00134171

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,636

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Decreasing higher-order absolute risk aversion and higher-degree stochastic dominance.Michel Denuit & Liqun Liu - 2014 - Theory and Decision 76 (2):287-295.
Stronger utility.Pavlo R. Blavatskyy - 2014 - Theory and Decision 76 (2):265-286.
Dynamic stochastic dominance in bandit decision problems.Thierry Magnac & Jean-Marc Robin - 1999 - Theory and Decision 47 (3):267-295.
Stochastic dominance in multicriterion analysis under risk.Jean-Marc Martel & Kazimierz Zaras - 1995 - Theory and Decision 39 (1):31-49.
Convex stochastic dominance with finite consequence sets.Peter C. Fishburn - 1974 - Theory and Decision 5 (2):119-137.
Fixing Stochastic Dominance.Jeffrey Sanford Russell - forthcoming - The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Bayesian Decision Theory and Stochastic Independence.Philippe Mongin - 2017 - TARK 2017.
Difference Minimizing Theory.Christopher J. G. Meacham - 2019 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 6.
Expected utility without utility.E. Castagnoli & M. Li Calzi - 1996 - Theory and Decision 41 (3):281-301.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-01-04

Downloads
43 (#522,046)

6 months
4 (#1,260,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Utility and stochastic dominance.Karl Borch - 1977 - In Maurice Allais & Ole Hagen (eds.), Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. D. Reidel. pp. 193--201.

Add more references