The Relativity of Theory by Moti Mizrahi: Reply by the Author

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 87:173-174 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I’m grateful to Aleta Quinn and Studies in History and Philosophy of Science for hosting this book forum for my book, The Relativity of Theory (Springer, 2020). I’m also grateful to Margaret Greta Turnbull and Joseph Martin for their commentaries. In what follows, I address their comments as I understand them.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Why Park’s Argument from Double Spaces is Not a Problem for Relative Realism.Moti Mizrahi - 2021 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (6):58-62.
Getting Gettier Right: Reply to Mizrahi.Philip Atkins - 2017 - Logos and Episteme 8 (3):347-357.
In Defense of Relative Realism: A Reply to Park.Moti Mizrahi - 2021 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 10 (1):1-6.
Reply by the Author. [REVIEW]Matthew J. Brown - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 89 (C):301-303.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-04-23

Downloads
654 (#40,622)

6 months
57 (#95,590)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Moti Mizrahi
Florida Institute of Technology

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A confutation of convergent realism.Larry Laudan - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (1):19-49.
A Confutation of Convergent Realism.Larry Laudan - 2001 - In Yuri Balashov & Alexander Rosenberg (eds.), Philosophy of Science: Contemporary Readings. New York: Routledge. pp. 211.
History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions.Imre Lakatos - 1970 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1970:91-136.
Constructive Empiricism Now.Bas C. van Fraassen - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 106 (1-2):151-170.

View all 6 references / Add more references