- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
A decision-congruent heuristic gives superior metacognitive sensitivity under realistic variance assumptions
Psychological Review 127 (5):655-671 (2020)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Hakwan Lau: In Consciousness We Trust. [REVIEW]Simon Brown & Ian B. Phillips - 2022 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Review of Books 2022.
The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in perceptual decision making.Medha Shekhar & Dobromir Rahnev - 2021 - Psychological Review 128 (1):45-70.
Empirical science meets higher order views of consciousness: reply to Hakwan Lau and Richard Brown.Ned Block - 2018 - In Adam Pautz & Daniel Stoljar (eds.), Blockheads! Essays on Ned Block’s Philosophy of Mind and Consciousness. new york: MIT Press.
Self-evaluation of decision-making: A general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation.Stephen Fleming & Nathaniel Daw - 2017 - Psychological Review 124 (1):91-114.
Predicting Risk Sensitivity in Humans and Lower Animals: Risk as Variance or Coefficient of Variation.Elke U. Weber, Sharoni Shafir & Ann-Renée Blais - 2004 - Psychological Review 111 (2):430-445.
Scale (in)variance in a unified diffusion model of decision making and timing.Patrick Simen, Ksenia Vlasov & Samantha Papadakis - 2016 - Psychological Review 123 (2):151-181.
Bias and blindsight: A reply to Michel and Lau (2021).Ian Phillips - 2021 - Psychological Review 128 (3):592-595.
Evaluation of the priority heuristic as a descriptive model of risky decision making: Comment on Brandstätter, Gigerenzer, and Hertwig (2006).Michael Birnbaum - 2008 - Psychological Review 115 (1):253-260.
Downward Causation and the Neurobiology of Free Will.Nancey Murphy, George Ellis & Timothy O'Connor (eds.) - 2009 - Springer Verlag.
Motor outcomes congruent with intentions may sharpen metacognitive representations.Angeliki Charalampaki, Caroline Peters, Heiko Maurer, Lisa K. Maurer, Hermann Müller, Julius Verrel & Elisa Filevich - 2023 - Cognition 235 (C):105388.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-03-20
Downloads
24 (#911,194)
6 months
6 (#862,561)
2020-03-20
Downloads
24 (#911,194)
6 months
6 (#862,561)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
A confidence framing effect: Flexible use of evidence in metacognitive monitoring.Yosuke Sakamoto & Kiyofumi Miyoshi - 2024 - Consciousness and Cognition 118 (C):103636.
On why we lack confidence in some signal-detection-based analyses of confidence.Derek H. Arnold, Alan Johnston, Joshua Adie & Kielan Yarrow - 2023 - Consciousness and Cognition 113 (C):103532.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-fcc9b7db9-hmqz7 uwo