Dr. Baird's criticism of the iowa studies in psychology

Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 3 (2):45-47 (1906)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

01609335

DOI

10.2307/2011717

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,225

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

A reply to dr. Miner.J. W. Baird - 1906 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 3 (4):101-104.
A Reply to Dr. Miner.James Burt Miner - 1906 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 3 (4):101-104.
Final statements in the discussion between professor Miner and dr. Baird.James Burt Miner - 1906 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 3 (11):291-298.
What is criticism: Reply to dr. spingarn.Irving Babbitt - 1914 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 11 (12):328-329.
Comment on dr. goldenweiser's "history, psychology, and culture".Charles A. Ellwood - 1919 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 16 (3):75-77.
Rejoinder to Dr. Spaulding.Edward Gleason Spaulding - 1911 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 8 (3):77-79.
Reply to dr. Hughes.Wendell T. Bush - 1905 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (24):663-664.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
25 (#879,283)

6 months
9 (#482,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references