The Contingency Argument

The Monist 54 (3):359-373 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

If the 1960’s did not see a resurgence of belief in God, they at least witnessed a renewed interest in him, stimulated by die writings of Harvey Cox, John Robinson and the so-called death-of-God theologians. These were concerned with the phenomenon of the ‘absence of God’, so called because, for all the difference he seemed to make in the day-to-day business of nations and cultures, God might just as well not exist. Whatever knowledge gaps may previously have existed have already been plugged either in fact or in principle, and this without any explanation involving a God. The universe no longer seems to point beyond itself, but seems, on the contrary, pretty clearly self-sufficient. In such circumstances the ground has been cut from under anyone wanting to say that God exists. And if the claim continues to be made, it is from a philosophical viewpoint quite gratuitous.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

    This entry is not archived by us. If you are the author and have permission from the publisher, we recommend that you archive it. Many publishers automatically grant permission to authors to archive pre-prints. By uploading a copy of your work, you will enable us to better index it, making it easier to find.

    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 103,748

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
96 (#230,067)

6 months
7 (#573,527)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The no-evidence defence.Barry Miller - 1972 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 3 (1):44 - 50.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references