Some hard questions for critical rationalism

Abstract

‘What distinguishes science from all other human endeavours is that the accounts of the world that our best, mature sciences deliver are strongly supported by evidence and this evidence gives us the strongest reason to believe them.’ That anyway is what is said at the beginning of the advertisement for a conference on induction at a celebrated British seat of learning in 2007. It shows how much critical rationalists still have to do to make known the message of Logik der Forschung concerning what empirical evidence is able to do and what it does.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 101,394

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Implicit learning: What does it all mean?David R. Shanks & Mark F. St John - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):557-558.
Belief and the Will.Anthony O'Hear - 1972 - Philosophy 47 (180):95 - 112.
Epistemic Rules.Paul A. Boghossian - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (9):472-500.
Logical Maximalism in the Empirical Sciences.Constantin C. Brîncuș - 2021 - In Parusniková Zuzana & Merritt David (eds.), Karl Popper's Science and Philosophy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 171-184.
Evidence.David Rynin - 1960 - Synthese 12 (1):6 - 24.
Faith, Doubt, and Reason.Brent A. R. Hege (ed.) - 2020 - Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Some Puzzling Aspects of Social Interaction.Omar K. Moore & Alan R. Anderson - 1962 - Review of Metaphysics 15 (3):409 - 433.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-06

Downloads
52 (#419,040)

6 months
52 (#100,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?